As on the other thread it seemed that the teams feedback was required, I asked the various teams/captains likely to play Div 1 Priory League next season about playing PAR 11 the votes are:

Amida - yes
Bexley - yes
Bromley CC - yes
Dulwich - yes
Rodmersham - yes
Tunbridge Wells - yes

Park Langley - no

+ Another team - tbc.

Ie. For PAR 11 - 6 votes, Against 1 with one to be determined.

Views: 0

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This appears to be running a bit off the subject and as there doesn't appear to be any admin can I suggest that you post your questions as new subjects in the forum and try and stay with the subject of PAR in this one.
I've already posted something under the heading "Is there anybody there" as I believe, like yourself, that people should be using the opportunity of this forum to have their voices/ opinions heard.
I can also agree regarding the publishing of the rules for both OK and Priory (sorry Mark if they're here somewhere but I haven't found them).
Thanks Phil., agreed. Let's keep the topics on track please.

Cracker, I see you're disgruntled, may I suggest you speak to the Kent Committee as they are in fact doing a lot more than you may think. I'm going to address this point in another discussion post so need need to reply here - let's keep this one on PAR 11.
How about making it PAR 11 for div 1 then PAR 13 or 15 for the divisions below so that the games are similar in length to the current HIHO scoring system and the grinders of this world get a chance to catch the quick off the draw squash shot slingers?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2012   Created by Mark Lennox.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service