Kent Squash & Racketball
Leagues . News . Forums
Shoot them!
I enjoy a bit of fun - but PL3 (DC) should be aware of the severe penalties for playing phoney people. At 20 points a shot, I reckon 100 per team should just about cover it. ;)
Views: 264
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by George Bushell on -
I do not have a scooby do what you are on about Creeky, please explain. Do you think I'm Jeremy Clarkson or something !
-
Permalink Reply by John Creek on -
Of course you do, George.
'Non entry on the website ... full surnames ... will result in a one point deduction per incorrect or non entry to the home team.
Failure to enter the correct name of a player on the match result ... will be seen as a serious offence and the tie awarded to the opposition by 20-0 points.'
If memory serves - it was put in the rules so that us Clarksons could understand other people's humour - not out of spite. I'm still stuck on 'The Poor Man's Clive London', but at least they've put the nominations on now, so I can work it out.
-
Permalink Reply by Mark Lennox on -
If you mean the dodgy names then we're not sure who posted them. I was actually looking forward to one of Ray's reports. Come on DC, get the names right and whack up the match report!
-
Permalink Reply by HS on -
And more to the point when did James Evans get transferred to Maidstone!!!! See below from Wednesdays game at BL (should that be Cray??)
Nom Home Player Nom Away Player Result Games Craig Hulbert Josh Masters 0-3 3/9 4/9 0/9 Hani AbouTaleb James Evans 0-3 5/9 6/9 0/9 George Fray Graham Appleby 3-1 9/3 9/4 0/9 10/8 Adam Peacock Ray Burchell 3-0 9/4 9/1 10/8 Ash Abou Taleb Lee McIntosh 3-2 9/3 10/9 5/9 5/9 9/1
-
Permalink Reply by John Creek on
-
HS, luckily OK don't have the same draconian sentencing tariffs for serious offences like these. No doubt all will be rectified once the new (unified rules) regime is in place.
-
Permalink Reply by Phill Crane on -
Oh yes we do, a few years back I was entering nicknames on the results website and the Mote lost all their points for a few matches. The League Sec wouldn't allow any later corrections even though I did point out that a number of Priory teams were filling out their online results in this fashion. I also pointed out that at that time there wasn't a rule regarding completion of online results for the OK Leagues.
Grrrrrr!!!
-
Permalink Reply by George Bushell on
-
Ah right with it now Creeky although you it would seem are not. As you can see I have added comment that I have no idea who put the names up although I presume it is a Dulwich lad due to the names given to their own players. If you care to look at my postings, you will see I always put correct names in with the scores and only default to nicknames on the match report. Shame about this week, I had a beaut' lined up centered around the Dulwich number 1. Hey ho !
-
Permalink Reply by John Creek on
-
Ray - you may have been had. The penalties apply to the home team. You have until tonight to amend any results before the full force of the law will come down on you like a ton of bricks. Good luck.
-
Permalink Reply by George Bushell on
-
You need to get out more Creeky !
John Creek said:Ray - you may have been had. The penalties apply to the home team. You have until tonight to amend any results before the full force of the law will come down on you like a ton of bricks. Good luck.
-
Permalink Reply by John Creek on
-
You're welcome.
© 2012 Created by Mark Lennox.
