Paul's away on holiday. But rest assured Priory Squashers, when he returns he resume his new self appointed status as the 5 player enforcer! *
* Tunbridge Wells team exempt.
Hello all. As Ken has mentioned when initiating the post we had a good discussion about the PAR debate at the match dinner last week and given that we’ve had a few matches now (plus a few over the winter) I just thought I’d chuck my pennies worth in…
Ian
The main complaint against PAR is that it shortens games but your proposal would incentivise players to go for winners with reckless abandon as a player can now significantly increase their error count but still win.
Also it seems unfair to re…
Have to say I'm fairly indifferent between PAR and HiHo. In my limited experience of playing PAR I haven't noticed a huge deal of difference in match times. We played Dulwich last night, only had four players, started promptly and didn't finish unti…
Very sensible solution. Best of both worlds I feel. HIHO trumps PAR unless both captains want PAR. We'll get some variety and hopefully this will add to the enjoyment of the game.
Thanks committee, great work.
Sam played as if it were point per tin not point per rally.
No complaints about the scoring from any of our players. The match did finish early but that was probably due to all the matches being fairly one sided (as in the first half) rather than a…
Hi All
This might be a stupid suggestion and might just muddle the issue further, but has anyone considered an option where the home team choose the scoring system they want for the season? That way all home games will be played under each team’s p…
Hi
I think at some point in this thread someone suggested having a vote by the captains of the teams in the PL 1st division as to whether PAR 11 should be adopted. I think this would be a good idea. Votes could be easily counted and verified. One v…
August 18, 2009
Jolyon Head is now a member of Kent Squash & Racketball