Hythe 2 vs Folkestone 3
Had a thought this morning driving down to Southampton at 5:30am, How bored was I?
Here goes, is it fair that a team gets 20 points for a walkover even though it’s not there fault? Example, if a team 3rd from bottom can field a team against a team 3rd from top who cannot field a team, they gain 20 points which seems a little harsh on the teams within the bottom half of the league who must feel penalised also, if your fighting for survival and your nearest and dearest relagation threat picks up 20 points for not being able to play then is that fair? There seems to be to many walkovers which can effect promotion and relegation battles.
Heres an idea, how about any walkovers are looked at at the end of each half, your league position is then taken into account, if you have won 60% of your matches then you receive 60% of the 20 points (12 points), if you have won 20% of your matches then (4 points). I do not think this is unfair as this reflects your current form and league position.
Just an idea. Don’t start shooting as this is not aimed at anybody…..
ok. Dulwich won the league again zzzzzzzzzzzzzz How about a new discussion away from the old farts V Game improvers (PAR v HOHI) and nomitate a player of the summer from each division. It would be something lighthearted that everyone could get involved with.
Not sure how to set it up any suggestions?